Consumer Advocate SeQuoia King Accuses Amazon Over Misleading Hypoallergenic Claims

0Comments

SeQuoia King has taken legal action against a major online retailer, alleging deceptive marketing practices related to their hypoallergenic body wash. On February 6, 2026, King filed a class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com, Inc. The lawsuit accuses the company of misleading consumers by labeling their body wash as hypoallergenic when it contains fragrance chemicals known to cause skin allergies.

The case centers around Amazon’s Hypoallergenic Body Wash for Sensitive Skin, part of their “Basics” collection. The product is marketed as dermatologist-tested and suitable for sensitive skin, yet it includes unspecified fragrance chemicals. According to King, these ingredients are among the most common causes of skin allergies, contradicting the product’s hypoallergenic claims. Citing sources like the American Academy of Dermatology and WebMD, King highlights that millions suffer from fragrance allergies and argues that consumers have been misled into purchasing a product that could potentially irritate sensitive skin.

King purchased the body wash multiple times from Amazon.com, believing it was free from irritants due to her psoriasis condition. She asserts that had she known about the presence of allergens in the product, she would not have bought it or paid as much as she did. The complaint alleges violations of New York General Business Law §§ 349 and 350 concerning deceptive acts and false advertising. King seeks compensation for damages incurred by herself and other affected consumers during the statute of limitations period.

The plaintiff is seeking various forms of relief from the court, including compensatory damages exceeding $5 million, statutory damages under New York law, punitive damages, restitution, and attorneys’ fees. The case emphasizes the broader issue of misleading labeling practices in consumer products marketed as hypoallergenic without regulatory standards enforcing such claims.

Representing SeQuoia King are attorneys Max S. Roberts, Victoria X. Zhou, and Caroline C. Donovan from Bursor & Fisher P.A., based in New York City. The case is being heard under Civil Action No.: 1:26-cv-1062 in front of judges at the Southern District Court of New York.

Source: 126cv01062_Sequoia_King_v_Amazon_Complaint_Southern_District_of_New_York.pdf


Related

John A. Sarcone III, First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York

Pennsylvania man sentenced to 80 years for sexual abuse and exploitation of children

A Pennsylvania man has been sentenced to 80 years following convictions related to aggravated sexual abuse involving toddlers across state lines. Authorities say Trevor Metterhauser’s actions were uncovered through coordinated investigations spanning New York and Texas.

Courthouses of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York

United States Bankruptcy Court adopts revised Chapter 13 Model Plan effective June 2026

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York will require a new model plan form for all Chapter 13 cases starting June 2026. The court says this change will standardize filings across future cases.

Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Andrew Ford charged with sexual exploitation and transportation of a minor

Andrew Ford has been charged with sexual exploitation and transportation of a minor following his arrest. Authorities allege he abused a thirteen-year-old girl across state lines between New York and Connecticut. Law enforcement encourages anyone with relevant information to contact federal investigators.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from New York Courts Daily.