Plaintiffs Accuse Nassau Community College Officials of Retaliation Over Free Speech

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
0Comments

A heated legal battle is unfolding in New York as two students allege that their rights were violated by a prominent educational institution. On November 12, 2025, Jordon Groom and Grant Peterson filed a complaint in the Eastern District of New York against Nassau Community College (NCC) and several of its employees, including Maria P. Conzatti, David Oyero, Charmian Smith, and Craig Wright. The plaintiffs claim that their constitutional rights were infringed upon following a series of events tied to their roles within the college’s student government.

The lawsuit details how Groom and Peterson, both residents of Nassau County, found themselves at odds with NCC after engaging in what they believed was protected speech under the First Amendment. According to the complaint, Peterson had filed a formal discrimination complaint on November 6, 2024, which was dismissed by NCC on January 22, 2025. This dismissal came with disciplinary actions against both plaintiffs without due process or an opportunity for appeal. The plaintiffs argue that these actions were retaliatory measures taken by NCC in response to their criticisms of the college’s policies and practices.

Peterson and Groom’s allegations are grounded in violations of several federal statutes including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and various sections under Title 42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). They claim that NCC’s actions not only silenced them but also discriminated against Peterson based on his disability. The complaint highlights instances where Peterson felt threatened by remarks from NCC staff and describes how his formal complaints were ignored or dismissed without proper consideration.

The plaintiffs are seeking a judgment that would declare NCC’s actions unconstitutional under both federal and state laws. They request an injunction to clear any disciplinary records stemming from these incidents and seek damages for injuries suffered due to these alleged violations. Additionally, they demand compensation for legal fees incurred during this process.

Representing Groom and Peterson is Gregory A. Byrnes from Anderson Law PLLC. The case has been assigned Case No. LS-cv-6297 in front of judges at the Eastern District Court of New York.

Source: 125cv06297_Jordon_Groom_v_Nassau_Comminuty_Complaint_Eastern_District_of_New_York..pdf



Related

Joseph Nocella, Jr. U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York

Candidate for New York City Public Advocate charged with wire fraud

Angela Aquino has been charged with wire fraud related to her bid for New York City Public Advocate after authorities allege she tried obtaining $1 million through fraudulent means from city matching funds programs. Prosecutors say she falsified donation records and used campaign money for personal expenses.

Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Two foreign nationals charged with fraud involving ‘Trump Bucks’ scheme in the United States

Federal prosecutors have charged two North Macedonian nationals for allegedly selling fake ‘Trump Bucks’ products across America while falsely claiming ties to former president Donald Trump’s campaign or businesses. Authorities say victims lost hundreds of thousands of dollars through these scams targeting mainly seniors.

Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York

Defendant extradited from Dominican Republic to face charges for Manhattan pill operation

Ruddy Cenit-Then has been extradited from the Dominican Republic after being charged with running an alleged large-scale illegal pill operation out of a Manhattan apartment. Prosecutors say he faces serious federal charges related to distributing fentanyl and methamphetamine.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from New York Courts Daily.